Key practice points:
- From 1 May, 2018, pregabalin will be fully subsidised without restriction; it was not previously subsidised
- From 1 June, 2018, Special Authority approval requirements will be removed from gabapentin and it will be fully
subsidised without restriction
- Tricyclic antidepressants (TCAs), gabapentin and pregabalin are recommended first-line pharmacological treatments
for patients with neuropathic pain
- There is no clear evidence that tricyclic antidepressants, gabapentin or pregabalin are more effective than each
other for neuropathic pain
- Response to medicines for neuropathic pain is variable and patients may need to trial multiple medicines, doses
and combinations to achieve a satisfactory regimen; in some cases all pharmacological options will be ineffective
- Gabapentin and pregabalin both have potential for misuse or diversion (on-selling); primary care health professionals
should be alert for potential drug seeking behaviour
This article is an update to our 2016 article on managing neuropathic pain, focusing on the use of gabapentin
and pregabalin, as subsidy changes will come into effect for these medicines in mid-2018. For further information on
the diagnosis and full range of treatments for neuropathic pain, see:
Managing patients with neuropathic pain” bpacNZ, May 2016
From mid-2018 clinicians in primary care will have more prescribing options for patients with neuropathic pain
Tricyclic antidepressants (TCAs), gabapentin or pregabalin (see: “What is pregabalin”)
are recommended first-line medicines for patients with neuropathic pain.1, 2 * TCAs used to manage neuropathic
pain, such as amitriptyline and nortriptyline, are fully subsidised without restriction. From 1 June, 2018, the requirement
for Special Authority approval will be removed from gabapentin and it can be prescribed fully subsidised without restriction.† The
subsidised brand of gabapentin will also change (see: “The subsidised brand of gabapentin is
changing”). From 1 May, 2018, pregabalin can be prescribed fully subsidised without restriction†; it
was not previously subsidised.
Topical capsaicin cream (0.075%) may be appropriate for patients with localised pain; it is subsidised if the prescription
is endorsed, stating that it is for a patient with post-herpetic neuralgia or diabetic peripheral neuropathy. Opioids,
such as tramadol or morphine, are second and third-line options for neuropathic pain as they are not as safe or effective
as first-line options.3
* Carbamazepine is recommended as the first-line medicine for patients with trigeminal neuralgia 1,
2
† Concurrent use of gabapentin and pregablin is not subsidised, i.e. only one medicine will be subsidised
at a time.
Setting realistic expectations for treatment with gabapentin or pregabalin for neuropathic pain
Gabapentin and pregabalin are not superior to TCAs for neuropathic pain: there
is insufficient evidence to conclude that any of the first-line medicines are more effective than one another or provide
better outcomes for patients with neuropathic pain.2, 3
Gabapentin and pregabalin are not recommended as general analgesics: they
are not indicated, and have limited effectiveness, for the treatment of nociceptive pain without a neuropathic component,
e.g. non-specific chronic low back pain.5
Medicines for managing neuropathic pain are modestly effective: randomised
placebo controlled trials indicate that four to ten patients would need to be treated with a first-line medicine for
neuropathic pain for three to 12 weeks for one patient to have a 50% reduction in pain, compared to no treatment (NNT
= 4–10).3 As pain reduction is a more realistic expectation than elimination of pain, patients can be encouraged
to continue using a medicine if some benefit is gained, provided that adverse effects and other risks from treatment
do not outweigh this benefit.
The response to medicines for neuropathic pain is highly individual: patients
may find they have little pain relief with one medicine but benefit from another, and a medicine that does not work
well for one patient may be beneficial for another.6
It may take some time for medicines to be effective: a four to eight week
trial, or longer, of treatment is appropriate before assessing whether a medicine for neuropathic pain has worked.
This allows time for titrating to an optimum dose, and taking that dose for a sufficient duration.7
Consider adverse effects, interactions and co-morbidities to guide prescribing choices: also
consider a patient’s history of substance misuse; gabapentin and pregabalin have the potential to be misused for their
euphoric effects (see: “Pregabalin and gabapentin have significant potential for misuse”).
What is pregabalin
As pregabalin has not previously been subsidised in New Zealand, it may be a new medicine for some prescribers.
Like gabapentin, pregabalin was designed with the original therapeutic intent of managing seizures in patients
with epilepsy, however, in clinical practice it is primarily used for managing neuropathic pain. Both medicines
derived their names from their presumed action on the neurotransmitter gamma aminobutyric acid (GABA). However,
research has subsequently found that they do not activate GABA receptors.4 Some of their activity derives
from activating pre-synaptic calcium channels that are widely distributed in the body, which reduces the release
of several neurotransmitters, including glutamate, noradrenaline, serotonin and dopamine.4 Pregabalin
and gabapentin are often jointly referred to as gabapentinoids.4
Prescribing gabapentin or pregabalin for neuropathic pain
Before prescribing gabapentin or pregabalin, consider the following points:
Has a diagnosis of neuropathic pain been established? Characteristic sensory symptoms include burning, prickling
or electric shock sensations and sensitivity to touch (allodynia). A questionnaire such as the Leeds
Assessment of Neuropathic Symptoms and Signs (LANSS) can aid in diagnosis.
Is there an identifiable underlying cause to the pain that can be treated? e.g. nerve compression that may require
surgery
Have non-pharmacological treatments been discussed as part of the management plan? e.g. goal setting, pacing of
activities, mindfulness and relaxation techniques
Are there associated co-morbidities that also require management? e.g. depression, anxiety or insomnia
Has a TCA, such as amitriptyline or nortriptyline, been considered? e.g. a TCA may be a good option for a patient
with pain that is especially troublesome at night
Further information on diagnosing and managing neuropathic pain, including the LANSS, is available from:
bpac.org.nz/BPJ/2016/May/pain.aspx
Information for patients about neuropathic pain is available from:
www.healthnavigator.org.nz/health-a-z/n/nerve-pain/
Start with an analgesia plan
Whenever medicines are prescribed for pain, it is best practice to create an analgesia plan with the patient, which
can be discussed verbally and written down. A plan should provide the patient with clear instructions on how to use
their medicines appropriately, including the dose and frequency, when or if they can increase the dose, common adverse
effects and how to reduce the dose and stop medicines as their pain improves. Agree on a review schedule, e.g. seeing
the patient again within two to four weeks of initiating a medicine or changing a dose, in order to assess the development
of adverse effects and how well their pain is controlled.
An example of a pain management template is available from:
www.guild.org.au.
Initiating and escalating doses
Gabapentin requires an initial slower titration than pregabalin to minimise the incidence of dose-related adverse
effects, such as sedation and dizziness.2 A dosing protocol is given in Table 1. However,
for either medicine clinicians may prefer to use a much slower titration to a reach a dose that is maximally effective,
while minimising adverse effects. Patients who are more susceptible to adverse effects, such as frail elderly people,
may be started on lower doses than shown in Table 1, and titrated more gradually.12 For
example, initiate gabapentin 100 mg, once daily at night, increasing to 100 mg, twice daily, then 100 mg, three times
daily. Some patients may require one week at each dose before increasing to the next.
Reduced doses are required in patients with renal impairment
Pregabalin and gabapentin are not metabolised to a significant extent and are excreted in the urine unchanged. They
do not affect the metabolism of other medicines, such as oral contraceptives or anticonvulsants.13 Reduced
doses are required in patients with an eGFR ≤ 80 mL/minute/1.73m2 for gabapentin or ≤ 60 mL/minute/1.73m2 for
pregabalin; refer to the NZF for specific dosing recommendations for patients with renal function below these thresholds:
gabapentin – www.nzf.org.nz/nzf_2629 pregabalin – www.nzf.org.nz/nzf_2631
Table 1:Dosing comparisons of gabapentin and pregabalin.3, 13, 14
|
Gabapentin |
Pregabalin |
Initial dosing and titration |
EITHER: Option 1: Increase by 300 mg each day
Day 1: 300 mg, once daily
Day 2: 300 mg, twice daily
Day 3: 300 mg, three times daily
OR: Option 2: Start higher but increase slower
Day 1: 300 mg, three times daily
Every two to three days thereafter: increase by 300 mg, daily in three divided doses |
Initially: 150 mg, daily in two divided doses After three to seven days: 300 mg, daily in two divided doses |
Dose frequency after initial titration |
Three times daily |
Twice daily |
Recommended dose range for patients with neuropathic pain |
1200–3600 mg, daily |
300–600 mg, daily |
Bioavailability (fraction of dose absorbed) |
Non-linear: Decreases as dose is increased; plasma concentrations do not increase proportionally with increasing
dose |
Linear: Constant at all doses; plasma concentrations increase in proportion to dosing, e.g. twice the dose
results in twice the blood level |
The subsidised brand of gabapentin is changing
Three brands of gabapentin are currently subsidised with Special Authority approval for patients with epilepsy,
neuropathic pain or pruritus associated with stage five chronic kidney disease. From 1 June, 2018, a different
brand of gabapentin will be subsidised, without restriction. All patients currently prescribed gabapentin will
need to change to the newly subsidised brand by 1 November, 2018. Provided clinicians prescribe generically, i.e.
writing/selecting “gabapentin” rather than a brand name, or checking the box to allow generic substitution on an
electronic prescription, this brand change will be done by the pharmacist.
Approximately 1300 people in New Zealand are taking gabapentin for the management of epilepsy.8 General
practitioners do not need to notify the New Zealand Transport Association (NZTA) if patients using gabapentin for
epilepsy change from one brand to another. Evidence suggests there is unlikely to be a change in seizure control
and switching brands of gabapentin does not constitute a change in treatment for the purposes of driver licence
assessment.9, 10 Changes to the appearance of a medicine can influence adherence, so further support
and discussion around these changes may be required for some patients.11
For further information on assisting patients with epilepsy with medicine adherence, see:
bpac.org.nz/2017/epilepsy.aspx
The adverse effects of gabapentin and pregabalin
Adverse effects, such as sedation, increase in frequency with higher doses of gabapentin and pregabalin, and doses
may need to be titrated up or down in order to find an acceptable balance between the analgesic effects and adverse
effects of these medicines.15
Problems with balance and sedation are the most commonly reported adverse
effects of gabapentin or pregabalin (Table 2). Up to one in three patients experience dizziness, and one in three,
sedation.16 Consider reducing doses or withdrawing these medicines if adverse effects are problematic. Tricyclic
antidepressants also cause sedation, but they can be dosed once daily at night, therefore this may be a better option
for some patients.
Weight gain is likely: Both gabapentin and pregabalin are associated with
a variable amount of weight gain, which is dose dependent and typically occurs after three to 12 months of use. The
majority of patients gain less than two kilograms, but up to 15% of patients, depending on dose, can gain over five
kilograms.17, 18 Encourage patients to follow recommendations for a healthy diet and exercise; maintaining
activity should also be part of the non-pharmacological management strategy for neuropathic pain.
Changes in mood may occur: In clinical trials, 6% of patients taking pregabalin
at therapeutic doses reported experiencing euphoria, and case reports suggest similar effects may occur in patients
taking gabapentin (see: “Pregabalin and gabapentin have significant potential for misuse”).15, 19 Pregabalin
and gabapentin are anti-epileptic medicines, and anti-epileptic medicines in general have been associated with a small
increased risk of suicidal thoughts and behaviour, regardless of indication.14 Patients should be encouraged
to report any unusual changes in mood, including euphoria.
Respiratory depression is possible: Recent evidence shows that in rare
cases gabapentin can cause respiratory depression.20 Lower doses may be necessary in patients at increased
risk of experiencing respiratory depression, including patients with respiratory or neurological disease, renal impairment,
elderly people and those who are also taking other CNS depressants, such as opioids (see: “Caution is required if gabapentin
or pregabalin are prescribed in combination with opioids”).21 Enquire at follow up appointments about breathing
difficulties, shallow breathing or any other respiratory symptoms.21
Table 2: Common adverse effects in patients taking pregabalin or gabapentin.15, 22, 23
|
Percentage of patients experiencing adverse effect |
Dizziness/balance |
19–31% |
Sedation |
14–29% |
Dry mouth |
15% |
Weight gain |
Up to 15% gain over 5 kg; see text for further details |
Peripheral oedema |
7% |
Constipation |
6% |
Euphoria* |
6% |
Abnormal thinking |
6% |
For further information on adverse effects of gabapentin and pregabalin, refer
to the NZF: www.nzf.org.nz/nzf_2628
* 6% of patients in clinical trials of pregabalin reported experiencing euphoria.15 There
are no similar clinical trial data for the incidence of euphoria when gabapentin is used as prescribed, however, both
medicines are misused for their euphoric effects.24 For further information, see: “Pregabalin
and gabapentin have significant potential for misuse”
Pregabalin and gabapentin have significant potential for misuse
Both gabapentin and pregabalin have the potential for misuse and diversion as recreational drugs.25, 26 They
are misused in order to produce euphoria, a state of relaxation and sociability or amplify the effects of other
recreational drugs.25 Reports suggest pregabalin may have a greater potential for misuse than gabapentin
as it is more likely to produce euphoria and has greater bioavailability at high doses.24 Clinicians
and pharmacists should be alert for early requests for repeat prescriptions or consider whether patients may be
obtaining prescriptions from multiple doctors. Establishing an appropriate analgesic plan with the patient prior
to prescribing, including the expected duration of use, may help reduce the potential for misuse (see: “Create
an analgesia plan with the patient”).
For further information on identifying and managing drug seeking behaviour, see:
bpac.org.nz/BPJ/2008/September/misuse.aspx
Follow up patients to assess benefit
A follow-up appointment should be scheduled two to four weeks after initiating or increasing the dose of any analgesic
for patients with neuropathic pain.6 Most patients can be expected to have a small reduction in pain but
are unlikely to be pain free. At least four to eight weeks of treatment with a first-line medicine is necessary for
doses to be titrated and taken at a therapeutic level for a sufficient duration to assess efficacy.7 Discuss
the balance of benefit and adverse effects with patients and whether they regard the reduction in pain sufficient to
continue using the medicine; this discussion can be regularly revisited if the medicine is continued.
A pain diary can help patients assess the effectiveness of an analgesic plan. A template is available
from: www.guild.org.au.
Changing or combining medicines for neuropathic pain
Increasing the dose or switching to another first-line medicine for neuropathic pain may be appropriate for patients
who experience a partial response but feel that the pain relief is still inadequate.6 If a first-line medicine
has not produced sufficient benefit, withdraw the medicine and initiate a different first-line medicine, e.g. a tricyclic
antidepressant if gabapentin or pregabalin has been insufficient, or vice versa. Despite the fact that pregabalin and
gabapentin have similar mechanisms of action, clinical experience suggests that patients who do not respond to one
of these medicines may still derive benefit from the other.27 If patients have not found any of the first-line
medicines sufficiently beneficial, consider combination treatment with two first-line medicines (see below).
Gradual dose reduction over seven days is recommended when withdrawing
patients from gabapentin or pregabalin as abrupt discontinuation can cause insomnia, nausea, sweating and anxiety;
slower withdrawal may be necessary in some patients.6 There is little evidence to help guide clinicians
regarding appropriate strategies to switch patients between these medicines.28 In some clinical trials,
patients have abruptly stopped one medicine and started the other the following day without reporting adverse effects.28 Alternatively,
a slower process of switching could be carried out, such as halving the dose of the original medicine, and introducing
the second at half the intended dose for the first few days, then stopping the original medicine and continuing treatment
with the second at the full dose.28
A combination of first-line medicines may be trialled: Combining medicines
with different mechanisms of action may provide patients with better analgesia than higher doses of a single medicine.29 For
example in one study, nortriptyline 50 mg, daily, with gabapentin 2000 mg, daily in divided doses, provided better
pain relief than nortriptyline 60 mg, daily or gabapentin 2250 mg, daily alone. Although the combination of gabapentin
with pregabalin is sometimes used in practice, there is little evidence to support this and subsidy is not available
for both medicines concurrently.9, 30
Re-consider the diagnosis of neuropathic pain or consider whether an underlying
condition is worsening if patients have trialled multiple first-line medicines without benefit.
Add opioids with caution
In some cases, first-line medicines will not be sufficient in patients with severe neuropathic pain and they will
also require an opioid, e.g. tramadol or morphine. Gabapentin or pregabalin can be continued in patients prescribed
opioids, however, caution is required as the combination of these medicines can increase the risk of potentially fatal
adverse effects, such as respiratory and CNS depression. The risk of accidental overdose is also increased and the
ability to perform tasks such as driving or operating machinery may be affected.24
Regularly consider the need for continued use of medicines
Although in many cases neuropathic pain is ongoing due to an underlying degenerative or non-treatable condition,
in some cases medicines for neuropathic pain will be prescribed for a condition where improvement is possible or expected,
e.g. post-herpetic neuralgia or post-surgery. Regular review of the ongoing need for analgesia is recommended. Expectations
for duration of treatment and a plan for withdrawal of medicines are best set when treatment is first initiated.