PEP recommendations based on mode of exposure.
Adapted from NZSHS PrEP and PEP guidelines (2023).
|
Source known HIV-positive |
Source of unknown HIV status |
|
Detectable or unknown viral load |
Undetectable viral load |
Source is MSM or from high-prevalence country |
Source from a low prevalence population |
Sexual exposure |
Receptive anal sex |
Three medicines |
Not recommended |
Two medicines |
Not recommended |
Insertive anal sex (circumcised and uncircumcised) |
Three medicines |
Not recommended |
Consider two medicines |
Not recommended |
Receptive vaginal sex |
Three medicines |
Not recommended |
Consider two medicinesa |
Not recommended |
Insertive vaginal sex |
Three medicines |
Not recommended |
Not recommended |
Not recommended |
Oral sex |
Not recommendedb |
Not recommended |
Not recommended |
Not recommended |
Occupational and other exposures
PEP for an occupational exposure must be prescribed by a named HIV prescriber. Patients who present in primary care requiring PEP following an occupational HIV exposure should be urgently referred for an acute medical assessment. |
Shared injecting equipment |
Three medicines |
Three medicinesc |
Consider three medicines |
Not recommended |
Occupational needlestick injury |
Three medicines |
Three medicinesc |
Generally not recommendedd |
Not recommended |
Mucosal exposure/splash injury to infectious fluids |
Three medicines |
Generally not recommendede |
Generally not recommended |
Not recommended |
Human bite |
Not recommendedf |
Not recommended |
Not recommended |
Not recommended |
Needlestick injury from a discarded needle in the community |
Not applicable |
Not applicable |
Not recommended |
Not recommended |
a. There should be a lower threshold for PEP if HIV source is from a high-risk group or normally resides in a country with a high HIV prevalence, there is damage to mucosa, there were multiple exposures within the 72-hour window or the presence of STIs
b. PEP should be considered following receptive oral sex if there is damage to their oral mucosa and ejaculation occurred
c. PEP is recommended in this situation, however, the risk of transmission is expected to be low
d. PEP should not be withheld while awaiting results of HIV testing if the source is from a group that has a high prevalence of HIV infection. If the source cannot be tested or identified, PEP should be considered on a case-by-case basis, following discussion with an infectious diseases physician.
e. PEP may be offered in an occupational exposure depending on individual patient circumstances
f. PEP may be appropriate for the victim in situations where the perpetrator is known to be HIV-positive with a viral load > 1,000 copies/mL, blood was visible in the perpetrator’s saliva and the bite has resulted in a severe or deep tissue injuries